Belarus vs Moldova: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural

Belarus
55.0%
in 2019
Moldova
51.1%
in 2018
Belarus rank
6th
Moldova rank
7th

Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time

  • Belarus
  • Moldova
0204060200820132019

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 55.0% against 51.1% in Moldova, a difference of 3.9%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 6th and Moldova ranks 7th of 31 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Belarus or Moldova?
Belarus, at 55.0% against 51.1% in Moldova as of 2019.
What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Belarus and Moldova?
3.9%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Moldova?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Belarus and Moldova rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
Belarus ranks 6th and Moldova ranks 7th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
32 places, 303 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)