Belarus vs Dominican Republic: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers

Belarus
55.2%
in 2019
Dominican Republic
47.4%
in 2021
Belarus rank
4th
Dominican Republic rank
5th

Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time

  • Belarus
  • Dominican Republic
0204060200720142021

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 55.2% against 47.4% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 7.8%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 4th and Dominican Republic ranks 5th of 35 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 63.0% 41.5% 21.6% Belarus
2010s 57.8% 44.3% 13.5% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Belarus or Dominican Republic?
Belarus, at 55.2% against 47.4% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Belarus and Dominican Republic?
7.8%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Dominican Republic?
11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Dominican Republic rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Belarus ranks 4th and Dominican Republic ranks 5th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 357 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)