Mexico vs South Africa: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Mexico
31.6%
in 2022
South Africa
29.0%
in 2021
Mexico rank
11th
South Africa rank
14th
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Mexico
- South Africa
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 31.6% against 29.0% in South Africa, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 14th of 35 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.9% | 22.8% | 3.1% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 29.4% | 27.2% | 2.2% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Mexico or South Africa?
- Mexico, at 31.6% against 29.0% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Mexico and South Africa?
- 2.6%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Mexico ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 14th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)