Belarus vs Honduras: Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural

Belarus
40.7%
in 2019
Honduras
40.1%
in 2019
Belarus rank
5th
Honduras rank
7th

Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time

  • Belarus
  • Honduras
0204060200820132019

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 40.7% against 40.1% in Honduras, a difference of 0.6%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 5th and Honduras ranks 7th of 33 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Honduras Difference Ahead
2000s 52.4% 42.5% 9.9% Belarus
2010s 48.1% 43.7% 4.4% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Belarus or Honduras?
Belarus, at 40.7% against 40.1% in Honduras as of 2019.
What is the difference in coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Belarus and Honduras?
0.6%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Honduras?
9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Honduras rank globally for coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
Belarus ranks 5th and Honduras ranks 7th of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 331 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)