Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Dominican Republic
4.2%
in 2021
Pakistan
3.9%
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
30th
Pakistan rank
31st
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Dominican Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 4.2% against 3.9% in Pakistan, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 31st of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.8% | 5.4% | 0.6% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 4.9% | 4.2% | 0.6% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
- Dominican Republic, at 4.2% against 3.9% in Pakistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 0.3%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 31st of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)