Brazil vs Chile: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban

Brazil
23.4%
in 2022
Chile
22.8%
in 2022
Brazil rank
16th
Chile rank
17th

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time

  • Brazil
  • Chile
0102030200620142022

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 23.4% against 22.8% in Chile, a difference of 0.6%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Brazil ranks 16th and Chile ranks 17th of 35 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 23.6% 25.1% 1.5% Chile
2010s 24.8% 18.6% 6.2% Brazil
2020s 22.0% 22.6% 0.6% Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Brazil or Chile?
Brazil, at 23.4% against 22.8% in Chile as of 2022.
What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Brazil and Chile?
0.6%, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
Brazil ranks 16th and Chile ranks 17th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 364 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)