Belarus vs Uruguay: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural

Belarus
33.1%
in 2019
Uruguay
30.4%
in 2022
Belarus rank
11th
Uruguay rank
12th

Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time

  • Belarus
  • Uruguay
0204060200820152022

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 33.1% against 30.4% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.7%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 31 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 48.1% 26.7% 21.4% Belarus
2010s 44.2% 29.1% 15.2% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Belarus or Uruguay?
Belarus, at 33.1% against 30.4% in Uruguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Belarus and Uruguay?
2.7%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
Belarus ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
32 places, 303 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)