Armenia vs Poland: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Armenia
62.0%
in 2022
Poland
51.9%
in 2019
Armenia rank
3rd
Poland rank
6th
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 62.0% against 51.9% in Poland, a difference of 10.1%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.1% | 51.3% | 0.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 55.3% | 49.5% | 5.8% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Armenia or Poland?
- Armenia, at 62.0% against 51.9% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Armenia and Poland?
- 10.1%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)