Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Kyrgyzstan
10.2%
in 2020
South Africa
16.0%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
31st
South Africa rank
29th
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 16.0% against 10.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.6 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.1% | 15.1% | 6.1% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 10.2% | 12.2% | 2.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 16.0% against 10.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)