Panama vs South Africa: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Panama
24.7%
in 2023
South Africa
26.5%
in 2021
Panama rank
16th
South Africa rank
13th
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Panama
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 26.5% against 24.7% in Panama, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Panama ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.9% | 24.6% | 1.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 27.6% | 26.5% | 1.2% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Panama or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 26.5% against 24.7% in Panama as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Panama and South Africa?
- 1.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Panama and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Panama ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)