El Salvador vs Thailand: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
El Salvador
43.3%
in 2022
Thailand
40.8%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
6th
Thailand rank
7th
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- El Salvador
- Thailand
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 43.3% against 40.8% in Thailand, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 6th and Thailand ranks 7th of 35 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.4% | 45.7% | 15.3% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 30.9% | 45.2% | 14.4% | Thailand |
| 2020s | 35.0% | 40.8% | 5.8% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, El Salvador or Thailand?
- El Salvador, at 43.3% against 40.8% in Thailand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between El Salvador and Thailand?
- 2.5%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Thailand rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 6th and Thailand ranks 7th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)