Belarus vs El Salvador: Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Belarus
48.9%
in 2019
El Salvador
43.3%
in 2022
Belarus rank
5th
El Salvador rank
6th
Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 48.9% against 43.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 5.6%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 6th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.3% | 31.4% | 20.9% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 47.9% | 31.7% | 16.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural, Belarus or El Salvador?
- Belarus, at 48.9% against 43.3% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 5.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 6th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)