Mongolia vs Poland: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Mongolia
31.7%
in 2020
Poland
36.1%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
13th
Poland rank
10th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 36.1% against 31.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 10th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.9% | 36.7% | 4.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 39.0% | 35.6% | 3.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 36.1% against 31.7% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Mongolia and Poland?
- 4.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Mongolia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 10th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)