Brazil vs Chile: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Brazil
10.3%
in 2022
Chile
15.1%
in 2022
Brazil rank
20th
Chile rank
17th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Brazil
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 15.1% against 10.3% in Brazil, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.5 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Brazil ranks 20th and Chile ranks 17th of 36 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.2% | 16.1% | 4.0% | Chile |
| 2010s | 11.7% | 11.8% | 0.1% | Chile |
| 2020s | 9.7% | 14.8% | 5.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Brazil or Chile?
- Chile, at 15.1% against 10.3% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Brazil and Chile?
- 4.8%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Brazil ranks 20th and Chile ranks 17th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)