Brazil vs Mongolia: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
4.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
16.1%
in 2020
Brazil rank
17th
Mongolia rank
14th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 16.1% against 4.0% in Brazil, a difference of 12.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 4.0 times Brazil's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 32 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.2% | 40.3% | 38.0% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 2.4% | 25.6% | 23.2% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 4.7% | 16.1% | 11.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 16.1% against 4.0% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 12.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)