Armenia vs Poland: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Armenia
59.6%
in 2022
Poland
56.1%
in 2019
Armenia rank
2nd
Poland rank
4th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 59.6% against 56.1% in Poland, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 32 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.4% | 47.1% | 4.2% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 53.1% | 48.7% | 4.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Armenia or Poland?
- Armenia, at 59.6% against 56.1% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Armenia and Poland?
- 3.5%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Contributory Pensions programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)