Brazil vs Serbia: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Brazil
10.1%
in 2022
Serbia
12.3%
in 2022
Brazil rank
34th
Serbia rank
33rd
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 12.3% against 10.1% in Brazil, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Serbia ahead.
Brazil ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.7% | 4.5% | 4.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 9.0% | 12.5% | 3.5% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -urban, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 12.3% against 10.1% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -urban between Brazil and Serbia?
- 2.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Brazil ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)