Peru vs South Africa: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Peru
10.3%
in 2022
South Africa
14.2%
in 2021
Peru rank
29th
South Africa rank
26th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 14.2% against 10.3% in Peru, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 26th of 35 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.4% | 20.1% | 11.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 6.6% | 10.0% | 3.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 14.2% against 10.3% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural between Peru and South Africa?
- 3.9%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Peru ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 26th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)