Peru vs Serbia: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Peru
10.3%
in 2022
Serbia
6.3%
in 2022
Peru rank
29th
Serbia rank
32nd
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 10.3% against 6.3% in Serbia, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.6 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 29th and Serbia ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.0% | 3.8% | 5.1% | Peru |
| 2020s | 9.4% | 8.7% | 0.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 10.3% against 6.3% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural between Peru and Serbia?
- 4.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Peru ranks 29th and Serbia ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)