Mongolia vs South Africa: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Mongolia
10.5%
in 2020
South Africa
14.2%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
28th
South Africa rank
26th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Mongolia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 14.2% against 10.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 26th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.2% | 22.2% | 7.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 10.5% | 5.9% | 4.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural, Mongolia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 14.2% against 10.5% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural between Mongolia and South Africa?
- 3.7%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 26th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)