El Salvador vs Thailand: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
El Salvador
31.2%
in 2022
Thailand
43.7%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
7th
Thailand rank
6th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- El Salvador
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 43.7% against 31.2% in El Salvador, a difference of 12.5%.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.4 times El Salvador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 7th and Thailand ranks 6th of 35 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.7% | 47.3% | 26.6% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 27.6% | 46.2% | 18.6% | Thailand |
| 2020s | 30.4% | 43.7% | 13.3% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural, El Salvador or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 43.7% against 31.2% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural between El Salvador and Thailand?
- 12.5%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Thailand rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- El Salvador ranks 7th and Thailand ranks 6th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)