Costa Rica vs Poland: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Costa Rica
23.1%
in 2022
Poland
19.9%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
17th
Poland rank
20th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Costa Rica
- Poland
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 23.1% against 19.9% in Poland, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 35 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.7% | 31.5% | 21.7% | Poland |
| 2010s | 17.7% | 26.4% | 8.7% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural, Costa Rica or Poland?
- Costa Rica, at 23.1% against 19.9% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural between Costa Rica and Poland?
- 3.2%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Poland rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Costa Rica ranks 17th and Poland ranks 20th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)