Belarus vs Ecuador: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Belarus
50.5%
in 2019
Ecuador
81.6%
in 2022
Belarus rank
4th
Ecuador rank
1st
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 81.6% against 50.5% in Belarus, a difference of 31.1%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.6 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 4th and Ecuador ranks 1st of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.3% | 7.0% | 48.3% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 52.7% | 47.5% | 5.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 81.6% against 50.5% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 31.1%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Ecuador ranks 1st of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)