Peru vs South Africa: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers
Peru
19.9%
in 2022
South Africa
16.9%
in 2021
Peru rank
23rd
South Africa rank
26th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 19.9% against 16.9% in South Africa, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 26th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.6% | 17.9% | 2.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 14.8% | 13.0% | 1.8% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 19.9% against 16.9% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers between Peru and South Africa?
- 3.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers?
- Peru ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 26th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)