Belarus vs El Salvador: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers
Belarus
49.2%
in 2019
El Salvador
35.3%
in 2022
Belarus rank
5th
El Salvador rank
7th
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 49.2% against 35.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 13.9%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.4 times El Salvador's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 7th of 37 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.2% | 27.7% | 24.5% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 50.5% | 28.7% | 21.8% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers, Belarus or El Salvador?
- Belarus, at 49.2% against 35.3% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 13.9%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 5th and El Salvador ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)