Palau vs Poland: Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
Palau
1 number
in 2025
Poland
1 number
in 2025
Palau rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture over time
- Palau
- Poland
How they compare
Palau currently reports 1 number against 1 number in Poland, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Palau ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 246 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 number | 1 number | 0 number | — |
| 2020s | 1 number | 1 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Palau or Poland?
- Palau, at 1 number against 1 number in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture between Palau and Poland?
- 0 number, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Palau and Poland rank globally for member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture?
- Palau ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 246 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Secretariat – processed by Our World in Data, published as Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO).