Kuwait vs Palau: Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
Kuwait
1 number
in 2025
Palau
1 number
in 2025
Kuwait rank
1st
Palau rank
1st
Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture over time
- Kuwait
- Palau
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 1 number against 1 number in Palau, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 246 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 number | 1 number | 0 number | — |
| 2020s | 1 number | 1 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Kuwait or Palau?
- Kuwait, at 1 number against 1 number in Palau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture between Kuwait and Palau?
- 0 number, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Palau?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Kuwait and Palau rank globally for member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture?
- Kuwait ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 246 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Secretariat – processed by Our World in Data, published as Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO).