Congo vs Zambia: Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
Congo
1 number
in 2025
Zambia
1 number
in 2025
Congo rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture over time
- Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1 number against 1 number in Zambia, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 246 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 number | 1 number | 0 number | — |
| 2020s | 1 number | 1 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Congo or Zambia?
- Congo, at 1 number against 1 number in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture between Congo and Zambia?
- 0 number, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for member countries of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture?
- Congo ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 246 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Secretariat – processed by Our World in Data, published as Member countries of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO).