Hong Kong, China vs South Africa: Corporate bond average maturity
Hong Kong, China
8.91 years
in 2015
South Africa
9.03 years
in 2021
Hong Kong, China rank
43rd
South Africa rank
42nd
Corporate bond average maturity over time
- Hong Kong, China
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 9.03 years against 8.91 years in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.12 years.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 42nd of 83 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.46 years | 8.7 years | 1.24 years | South Africa |
| 2010s | 7.67 years | 8.94 years | 1.26 years | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher corporate bond average maturity, Hong Kong, China or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 9.03 years against 8.91 years in Hong Kong, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in corporate bond average maturity between Hong Kong, China and South Africa?
- 0.12 years, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and South Africa?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Hong Kong, China and South Africa rank globally for corporate bond average maturity?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 42nd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Corporate bond average maturity (years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.