Georgia vs Malaysia: Control of Corruption - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval
Georgia
61.5%
in 2024
Malaysia
63.3%
in 2024
Georgia rank
76th
Malaysia rank
74th
Control of Corruption - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval over time
- Georgia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 63.3% against 61.5% in Georgia, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.
Georgia ranks 76th and Malaysia ranks 74th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.7% | 59.3% | 29.6% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 48.3% | 54.9% | 6.6% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 66.9% | 57.3% | 9.6% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 66.8% | 61.2% | 5.6% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval, Georgia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 63.3% against 61.5% in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval between Georgia and Malaysia?
- 1.8%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Malaysia rank globally for control of corruption - upper bound of the 90% confidence interval?
- Georgia ranks 76th and Malaysia ranks 74th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Control of Corruption - Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.