Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea-Bissau: Control of Corruption
Control of Corruption over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.2482 standard error against 0.2293 standard error in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0189 standard error.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd of 53 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2574 standard error | 0.4022 standard error | 0.1449 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 0.2308 standard error | 0.2655 standard error | 0.0348 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0.2299 standard error | 0.2521 standard error | 0.0222 standard error | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Equatorial Guinea or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.2482 standard error against 0.2293 standard error in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0189 standard error, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for control of corruption?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.