Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Control of Corruption
Control of Corruption over time
- Djibouti
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2293 standard error against 0.2275 standard error in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0018 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 6th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4509 standard error | 0.2574 standard error | 0.1935 standard error | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 0.2774 standard error | 0.2308 standard error | 0.0466 standard error | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 0.2278 standard error | 0.2299 standard error | 0.0022 standard error | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Djibouti or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2293 standard error against 0.2275 standard error in Djibouti as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0018 standard error, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for control of corruption?
- Djibouti ranks 6th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.