Comoros vs Equatorial Guinea: Control of Corruption
Control of Corruption over time
- Comoros
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.2785 standard error against 0.2293 standard error in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0492 standard error.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4509 standard error | 0.2574 standard error | 0.1935 standard error | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.2836 standard error | 0.2308 standard error | 0.0528 standard error | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.2806 standard error | 0.2299 standard error | 0.0507 standard error | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Comoros or Equatorial Guinea?
- Comoros, at 0.2785 standard error against 0.2293 standard error in Equatorial Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0492 standard error, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Comoros and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for control of corruption?
- Comoros ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.