Central African Republic vs Rwanda: Control of Corruption
Control of Corruption over time
- Central African Republic
- Rwanda
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.1888 standard error against 0.1842 standard error in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0046 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Rwanda ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 53 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4509 standard error | 0.4509 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.257 standard error | 0.2453 standard error | 0.0116 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1912 standard error | 0.1871 standard error | 0.0041 standard error | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Central African Republic or Rwanda?
- Central African Republic, at 0.1888 standard error against 0.1842 standard error in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Central African Republic and Rwanda?
- 0.0046 standard error, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Rwanda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Rwanda rank globally for control of corruption?
- Central African Republic ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.