Central African Republic vs Guinea: Control of Corruption
Control of Corruption over time
- Central African Republic
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.1901 standard error against 0.1888 standard error in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0013 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 16th and Guinea ranks 15th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4509 standard error | 0.4022 standard error | 0.0487 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.257 standard error | 0.2337 standard error | 0.0233 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1912 standard error | 0.1931 standard error | 0.0019 standard error | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Central African Republic or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 0.1901 standard error against 0.1888 standard error in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Central African Republic and Guinea?
- 0.0013 standard error, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Guinea rank globally for control of corruption?
- Central African Republic ranks 16th and Guinea ranks 15th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.