Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Control of Corruption
Control of Corruption over time
- Burkina Faso
- Tanzania
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0.1551 standard error against 0.1551 standard error in Tanzania, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 46th and Tanzania ranks 46th of 53 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4022 standard error | 0.2472 standard error | 0.155 standard error | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0.2158 standard error | 0.1826 standard error | 0.0332 standard error | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0.1579 standard error | 0.1574 standard error | 0.0004 standard error | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Burkina Faso or Tanzania?
- Burkina Faso, at 0.1551 standard error against 0.1551 standard error in Tanzania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
- 0 standard error, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania rank globally for control of corruption?
- Burkina Faso ranks 46th and Tanzania ranks 46th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.