Botswana vs Mali: Control of Corruption
Botswana
0.1586 standard error
in 2011
Mali
0.1567 standard error
in 2011
Botswana rank
40th
Mali rank
41st
Control of Corruption over time
- Botswana
- Mali
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.1586 standard error against 0.1567 standard error in Mali, a difference of 0.0019 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mali ahead.
Botswana ranks 40th and Mali ranks 41st of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2472 standard error | 0.4022 standard error | 0.155 standard error | Mali |
| 2000s | 0.1759 standard error | 0.2079 standard error | 0.032 standard error | Mali |
| 2010s | 0.1602 standard error | 0.1586 standard error | 0.0016 standard error | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Botswana or Mali?
- Botswana, at 0.1586 standard error against 0.1567 standard error in Mali as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Botswana and Mali?
- 0.0019 standard error, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mali?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Mali rank globally for control of corruption?
- Botswana ranks 40th and Mali ranks 41st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.