New Zealand vs Sweden: Control of Corruption - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval
New Zealand
81.2%
in 2024
Sweden
82.3%
in 2024
New Zealand rank
8th
Sweden rank
5th
Control of Corruption - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval over time
- New Zealand
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 82.3% against 81.2% in New Zealand, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sweden ahead.
New Zealand ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 5th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.1% | 91.5% | 2.4% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 86.8% | 85.1% | 1.7% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 86.2% | 85.0% | 1.2% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 83.8% | 83.8% | 0.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval, New Zealand or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 82.3% against 81.2% in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval between New Zealand and Sweden?
- 1.1%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for control of corruption - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval?
- New Zealand ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 5th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Control of Corruption - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.