Malaysia vs Samoa: Control of Corruption - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval
Malaysia
52.6%
in 2024
Samoa
50.4%
in 2024
Malaysia rank
58th
Samoa rank
61st
Control of Corruption - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval over time
- Malaysia
- Samoa
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 52.6% against 50.4% in Samoa, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 58th and Samoa ranks 61st of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46.1% | 32.5% | 13.5% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 42.8% | 37.0% | 5.8% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 46.7% | 42.8% | 3.9% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 50.5% | 51.8% | 1.3% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval, Malaysia or Samoa?
- Malaysia, at 52.6% against 50.4% in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval between Malaysia and Samoa?
- 2.2%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Samoa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Samoa rank globally for control of corruption - lower bound of the 90% confidence interval?
- Malaysia ranks 58th and Samoa ranks 61st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Control of Corruption - Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.