South Sudan vs Yemen: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- South Sudan
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 14.74 0-100 against 6.06 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 8.68 0-100.
That makes Yemen's figure about 2.4 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 204th and Yemen ranks 201st of 204 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.57 0-100 | 18.85 0-100 | 1.28 0-100 | Yemen |
| 2020s | 9.67 0-100 | 15.08 0-100 | 5.41 0-100 | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, South Sudan or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 14.74 0-100 against 6.06 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between South Sudan and Yemen?
- 8.68 0-100, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Yemen?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Yemen rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- South Sudan ranks 204th and Yemen ranks 201st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).