Micronesia, Federated States of vs Saudi Arabia: Control of Corruption - Governance score

Micronesia, Federated States of
62.19 0-100
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
63.09 0-100
in 2024
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
50th
Saudi Arabia rank
48th

Control of Corruption - Governance score over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • Saudi Arabia
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 63.09 0-100 against 62.19 0-100 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.9 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 50th and Saudi Arabia ranks 48th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Micronesia, Federated States of averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia, Federated States of Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 47.48 0-100 41.14 0-100 6.35 0-100 Micronesia, Federated States of
2010s 56.75 0-100 46.84 0-100 9.91 0-100 Micronesia, Federated States of
2020s 55.99 0-100 56.21 0-100 0.2206 0-100 Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Micronesia, Federated States of or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 63.09 0-100 against 62.19 0-100 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Micronesia, Federated States of and Saudi Arabia?
0.9 0-100, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Saudi Arabia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Saudi Arabia rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 50th and Saudi Arabia ranks 48th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs Saudi Arabia: Control of Corruption - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/micronesia-fed-sts/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/micronesia-fed-sts/saudi-arabia/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs Saudi Arabia: Control of Corruption - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).