Mauritius vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Mauritius
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 54.9 0-100 against 54.75 0-100 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.15 0-100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 75th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 74th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.67 0-100 | 66.04 0-100 | 10.37 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 54.95 0-100 | 62.59 0-100 | 7.64 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 55.29 0-100 | 54.69 0-100 | 0.5991 0-100 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Mauritius or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 54.9 0-100 against 54.75 0-100 in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.15 0-100, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Mauritius ranks 75th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 74th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).