Malta vs Namibia: Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100)
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100) (Control score 0-100) over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 51.62 0-100 against 51.03 0-100 in Namibia, a difference of 0.59 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Namibia ahead.
Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.04 0-100 | 62.94 0-100 | 3.1 0-100 | Malta |
| 2000s | 67.34 0-100 | 53.76 0-100 | 13.58 0-100 | Malta |
| 2010s | 64.43 0-100 | 56.34 0-100 | 8.09 0-100 | Malta |
| 2020s | 56 0-100 | 53.28 0-100 | 2.72 0-100 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 51.62 0-100 against 51.03 0-100 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Malta and Namibia?
- 0.59 0-100, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).