Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Tuvalu: Control of Corruption - Governance score

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
59.46 0-100
in 2024
Tuvalu
59.57 0-100
in 2024
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
59th
Tuvalu rank
58th

Control of Corruption - Governance score over time

  • Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
  • Tuvalu
020406080199620102024

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 59.57 0-100 against 59.46 0-100 in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, a difference of 0.11 0-100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 59th and Tuvalu ranks 58th of 204 countries.

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Tuvalu Difference Ahead
2000s 55.07 0-100 48.76 0-100 6.31 0-100 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2010s 56.87 0-100 46.87 0-100 10 0-100 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2020s 59.46 0-100 53.82 0-100 5.64 0-100 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 59.57 0-100 against 59.46 0-100 in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Tuvalu?
0.11 0-100, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Tuvalu?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Tuvalu rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 59th and Tuvalu ranks 58th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Tuvalu: Control of Corruption - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/macao-sar-china/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/macao-sar-china/tuvalu/">Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Tuvalu: Control of Corruption - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).