Kosovo vs Viet Nam: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Kosovo
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 42.76 0-100 against 42.7 0-100 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.06 0-100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 106th and Viet Nam ranks 104th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.47 0-100 | 35.47 0-100 | 10.01 0-100 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 39.82 0-100 | 39.91 0-100 | 0.0882 0-100 | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 41.73 0-100 | 42.07 0-100 | 0.3378 0-100 | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Kosovo or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 42.76 0-100 against 42.7 0-100 in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Kosovo and Viet Nam?
- 0.06 0-100, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Viet Nam?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kosovo and Viet Nam rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Kosovo ranks 106th and Viet Nam ranks 104th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).