Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Libya: Control of Corruption - Governance score

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
16.33 0-100
in 2024
Libya
16.85 0-100
in 2024
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
197th
Libya rank
195th

Control of Corruption - Governance score over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Libya
0102030199620102024

How they compare

Libya currently reports 16.85 0-100 against 16.33 0-100 in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.52 0-100.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Libya ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 197th and Libya ranks 195th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic People's Republic of Korea averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 21.67 0-100 33.12 0-100 11.44 0-100 Libya
2000s 21.76 0-100 25.76 0-100 4 0-100 Libya
2010s 21.49 0-100 19.06 0-100 2.43 0-100 Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2020s 15.5 0-100 16.77 0-100 1.27 0-100 Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Libya?
Libya, at 16.85 0-100 against 16.33 0-100 in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Libya?
0.52 0-100, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Libya?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Libya rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 197th and Libya ranks 195th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Libya: Control of Corruption - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/korea-dem-people-s-rep/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/korea-dem-people-s-rep/libya/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Libya: Control of Corruption - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).