Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Control of Corruption - Governance score

Kiribati
55.44 0-100
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
54.9 0-100
in 2024
Kiribati rank
73rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
74th

Control of Corruption - Governance score over time

  • Kiribati
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020406080200420142024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 55.44 0-100 against 54.9 0-100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.54 0-100.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 73rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 74th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 52.48 0-100 66.04 0-100 13.56 0-100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 52.44 0-100 62.59 0-100 10.15 0-100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 54.84 0-100 54.69 0-100 0.1544 0-100 Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Kiribati or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Kiribati, at 55.44 0-100 against 54.9 0-100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.54 0-100, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
Kiribati ranks 73rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 74th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Control of Corruption - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/kiribati/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/kiribati/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Control of Corruption - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).