Kiribati vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Control of Corruption - Governance score

Kiribati
55.44 0-100
in 2024
Marshall Islands, Republic of the
55.76 0-100
in 2024
Kiribati rank
73rd
Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank
71st

Control of Corruption - Governance score over time

  • Kiribati
  • Marshall Islands, Republic of the
0204060200420142024

How they compare

Marshall Islands, Republic of the currently reports 55.76 0-100 against 55.44 0-100 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.32 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 73rd and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 71st of 204 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Marshall Islands, Republic of the Difference Ahead
2000s 51.64 0-100 39.66 0-100 11.98 0-100 Kiribati
2010s 52.44 0-100 52.18 0-100 0.2581 0-100 Kiribati
2020s 54.84 0-100 49 0-100 5.84 0-100 Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Kiribati or Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
Marshall Islands, Republic of the, at 55.76 0-100 against 55.44 0-100 in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Kiribati and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
0.32 0-100, with Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
Kiribati ranks 73rd and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 71st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Control of Corruption - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/kiribati/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/kiribati/marshall-islands/">Kiribati vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Control of Corruption - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).