Kazakhstan vs Solomon Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance score

Kazakhstan
46.5 0-100
in 2024
Solomon Islands
45.02 0-100
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
92nd
Solomon Islands rank
95th

Control of Corruption - Governance score over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Solomon Islands
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 46.5 0-100 against 45.02 0-100 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 1.48 0-100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 92nd and Solomon Islands ranks 95th of 204 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 25.78 0-100 56.22 0-100 30.44 0-100 Solomon Islands
2000s 24.38 0-100 43.53 0-100 19.16 0-100 Solomon Islands
2010s 32.39 0-100 41.47 0-100 9.08 0-100 Solomon Islands
2020s 43.65 0-100 45.05 0-100 1.41 0-100 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Kazakhstan or Solomon Islands?
Kazakhstan, at 46.5 0-100 against 45.02 0-100 in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Kazakhstan and Solomon Islands?
1.48 0-100, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Solomon Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Solomon Islands rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
Kazakhstan ranks 92nd and Solomon Islands ranks 95th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Solomon Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/kazakhstan/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-score-0-100/kazakhstan/solomon-islands/">Kazakhstan vs Solomon Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).