Italy vs Oman: Control of Corruption - Governance score
Control of Corruption - Governance score over time
- Italy
- Oman
How they compare
Italy currently reports 59.05 0-100 against 58.12 0-100 in Oman, a difference of 0.93 0-100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 61st and Oman ranks 64th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.18 0-100 | 60.01 0-100 | 1.16 0-100 | Italy |
| 2000s | 58.03 0-100 | 58.09 0-100 | 0.0627 0-100 | Oman |
| 2010s | 51.06 0-100 | 48.38 0-100 | 2.68 0-100 | Italy |
| 2020s | 59.06 0-100 | 51.11 0-100 | 7.95 0-100 | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance score, Italy or Oman?
- Italy, at 59.05 0-100 against 58.12 0-100 in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance score between Italy and Oman?
- 0.93 0-100, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Oman?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Oman rank globally for control of corruption - governance score?
- Italy ranks 61st and Oman ranks 64th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).